Sidney Herald
religion column published November 3, 2013
In the British television show, Doc Martin, the newly
arrived doctor in a small village is annoyed by villagers using the waiting room
of his surgery as a social club. They assemble without having medical
complaints. Doc Martin rudely tells them, “If you don’t have an actual medical
complaint, just get out.”
John the Baptist did that too, with people who came without
spiritual confessions.
John proclaimed a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness
of sins. People were baptized by him, “confessing their sins.” (Matthew 3:6)
But then John saw some coming without confessing sin,
without repenting. He said, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from
the wrath to come?” (Matthew 3:7) He outdid Doc Martin with that one. Without
confession and repentance, John did not baptize. This is important to know later
when Jesus came to John to be baptized. What did Jesus need to be baptized for?
John said someone was coming with a greater baptism. He
said, “I baptize you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is
mightier than I. … He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.” (Matthew
3:11)
Who can baptize with the Holy Spirit? Who can baptize with
fire? This must be a holy person. John said it was Jesus.
So, when Jesus came to be baptized, “John would have
prevented him, saying, ‘I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?’
But Jesus answered him, ‘Let it be so now, for thus it is fitting for us to
fulfill all righteousness.’” (Matthew 3:14-15)
Jesus already was righteous. He came from heaven that way.
He had no sin, nothing to repent about. What did He mean?
Luther says Jesus accepted baptism from John because “he
was entering into our stead … becoming a sinner for us, taking upon himself the
sins which he had not committed, and wiping them out and drowning them in his
holy baptism.” (AE 51:315) Jesus came to Doc Martin with an actual problem, our
disease of sin.
The atonement already was under way at the river Jordan.
Jesus already was carrying our sins. Being substituted into our place as
sinners, He substituted himself into the repentance that was due from us. In his
state of humiliation, Jesus confessed and repented for us without himself
deserving condemnation. He presented his confession and repentance on our behalf
to the Father, and the Father credited us with these merits of Christ.
The baptism of Jesus is offensive. It tells us we need to
repent. Worse, it says we cannot repent, so Jesus had to do it for us. It says
we have to take charity; we are charity cases. That’s what happens when Christ’s
beloved Church baptizes us into the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. In
baptism, Christ gives to each one personally the gift of his repentance for us,
and then his repentance lives in us, for the forgiveness of sins.
For the naive apologists, for many
a dogmatician, even for many a politician who wanted to 'preserve religion for
the people,' this was a comfort and a satisfaction. For the church Philistine,
as Tholuck addressed him, it was reason for no longer knowing of an anguished
conscience. But then came Ludwig Feuerbach. Then came Karl Marx and Nietzsche.
They showed that the knowledge of 'natural' man arives at a totally different
result. ... Was it surprising that the generation of the war and the collapse
declared the Christian belief in God to be a delusion because it had been
refuted by the terrors and the fate that had been experienced? If that
generation had heard Luther instead of the theology of the nineteenth century
and the preaching that lives on such theology -- it would have understood him
and his primal dread (Urgrauen).
